CERN Pt. 2: "Just What do You Think You are Doing, Dave?"
After visiting the four major LHC experiments at CERN (and a fun Saturday teaching) all that was left was to head to the Computer Center to make some photos.You think you have archiving issues? You have no idea. More after the jump.
46,000,000,000,000,000 Bytes Can't Be Wrong
Forty six petabytes.
That's the current combined HD and tape storage attached to the large roomful of computers at the CERN Computer Center. Suffice to say, shooting everything in 16-bit RAW would not be a problem for them.
That storage (12PB of spinning hard disc space and another 34PB of robotically accessible tape storage) is what is needed to store and process the insane amounts of data that the LHC will throw off when it is up and running.
Basically, they first have to look at everything to see what is statistically likely to be able to be thrown away. At each of several computer screening processes down the line, the data is further culled in sort of a needle-in-a-haystack-to-the-Nth-degree process.
If they do it right, when they are done they will be left with strong evidence of the Higgs boson -- the Holy Grail of particle physics.
My hosts, Peter and Andras, said that they could use some new photos of the Computer Center. And since I happen to know a liiiittle bit about tape-drive mass storage back from my days as a proud owner of a Commodore 1530 Datasette tape drive, you gotta think I'm pretty well-suited for the job.
The robotic IBM tape drive seen at top was completely encased in a cabinet. There was a window at each end, and some small windows up top. There was some cool ambient (literally -- it was blue) floating around in there so I decided to go with it and gel the strobe with a CTB.
The CTB (tungsten-to-daylight conversion) gel is my favorite of the blues. It is natural looking, unlike some of the freaky blues that populate the sample books. It is also pretty efficient, not sucking up too much of the flash's light output. And last, it is easy to contrast with the corresponding CTO gels I keep with me all of the time.
We were not able to get inside the machines, which were running all of the time. That robotic head swoops around constantly at very high speed -- and high torque. As in deadly high torque if it catches you inside when it wants to do some tape hunting.
So, we could shoot through one of the end windows. But that would leave us with few options for lighting. We stuck an SB-800 with a CTB gel at the other end and originally aimed it away, at a nearby wall for a nice, clean light source. But Aaron suggested we try turning it around and firing it right into the innards of the machine. We tried it, and it looked better.

So, how do you expose for the inside of the machine? What power flash setting do you use?
It always comes down to solving your most important problem first. And my most important problem was to get some depth of field going, so more of those tapes would be in focus. The backlight would throw cool speculars off of them, so you want as many of them to read as possible. More power equals more depth of field.
Thus, first step is get some decent power into the flash. I set the SB-800 on 1/2 power, manual pop, and chimped the various apertures until it looked best. This is not rocket science here, right?
Next step: Balance the ambient. I have two sources to consider -- the inside lighting of the machine and the LED status light of the robotic head.
My flash power is set. My aperture is set. All that is left is to walk the shutter speed down -- 1/30, 1/15, 1/8, 1/4 -- until the LED and blue ambient start to look good.
A flash meter would be of little help to me in this shot. As soon as I get my arm in there with a Minolta Meter IVF, that thing would come to life, swoop in and lop it off, prolly.
But that's okay -- I have not used a flashmeter in years and still have two arms to prove it. You don't need a flashmeter. As long as you identify your primary problem to solve, that solution leads you to all of your other settings, one at a time, as described above.
Frankly, our biggest problem turned out to be the unpredictability of the positioning of the robotic head. It was about as uncooperative as your average three-year-old hyped up on a bowl of Frosted Flakes.
I wanted to light the head from the top with an amber-gelled second flash coming in from a top window. But the thing just would not cooperate, and we had to get upstairs to do the hard drives pretty soon. So we nixed the top light and went with a mix of backlit strobe and ambient interior lights.
Another Floor, Another Tunnel
Finished with the tape jukebox, we went upstairs to shoot the main computer room. The CERN guys are pretty good at assembling some serious processing power straight off of the rack, and this room is basically a ton of Linux boxes and hard drives strung together for massive processing and storage capabilities. It was pretty awesome to spend time there -- rows and rows of racks and racks of computers and hard drives. With almost no place to hide a light.

Okay, so take a look at the top view of the shooting alley, which is essentially two enclosed rooms. There are glass doors at each end (which we opened) and a glass roof. And we do not have enough light to nuke the whole room, so we will have to use the ambient.
So, first problem is to tame the ambient. It is a (thankfully) consistent fluorescent environment. For our purposes, this ambient light will come in from the top.
Set the camera to FL balance. Move the WB adjustments around until it looks best. Then underexpose the room by about two stops. This is because we will use the ambient as fill lighting to carry the whole room.
Since we are shifting the white balance, we will have to gel the strobes to compensate. No problem there -- just green 'em up.
So, where to put the strobes?
The subject would be Andras, who actually wrote the drive burn-in program that was causing all of the blue lights to blink on and off. It was like being on the bridge of the Enterprise. Or maybe in 2001: A Space Odyssey. I love technology, but I could see myself at night being a tad creeped out by all of these computers, HDs and tape drives going nonstop all around me.
(Not that it bothered Peter, our co-host and CERN computer whiz, who had promptly fallen asleep on one of the tables when we were shooting the tape drive monster.)
So the juncture between the rooms was a logical place to hide the key light, which was greened and fired through an umbrella. That would do two things: Light Andras from camera back right, and paint a nice specular on the left rack as it reflected back to me.
I put it on 1/8 power and adjusted my aperture until it looked best. Each time I moved my aperture, I would also have to compensate with my shutter speed to keep that minus two stop ambient exposure dialed in.
So that was easy enough. Now wold come the hard part -- how to fill Andras and pick up some of the spiffy hardware with light at the same time?
Position-wise, we had few choices. The most obvious being right next to the shooting position.
I stuck a second, greened SB-800 right at my left side. Just a foot or so away. This would fill Andras and throw some speculars off of the cables and Linux boxes. But it would also nuke everything in the foreground.

That's easy enough to fix with a grid spot on the flash. Everything along the edges that is close is also at the wide part of the flash beam. So knocking that out with a grid allows us to push the light down the tunnel and keep it from nuking the near sides at the same time.
How did we choose our power setting? Easy -- we already had the aperture chosen by the key light. The shutter was chosen to set the ambient exposure at a couple of stops under. Since those do not change, we simply adjust the power of the nearby "fill" strobe until we get the look we want.
No rocket science, no flash meter. Just good 'ol chimping.
Now all that was left was to make sure to catch some of the blinking hard drive lights. No big secret there, either. Shoot lots of frames and go for the law of averages. Worked like a charm.
__________
New to Strobist, or lighting? Start here.
Now shipping, in DVD box set or download: Lighting in Layers
Connect: Discussion Threads | Reader Photos | Twitter







25 Comments:
I hope there is a Part 3. This is an excellent series so far. Tons of entertaining info!
I concur... Keep 'em coming! :)
Great posts. Cheers!
Adrian
Great post. I really wish this one had been a video. I would have loved to see the process of getting the server room shoot going.
This whole series on the CERN facility is great.
I can't wait to see some of the results of the experimentation.
The strobist talks Linux!
Pinch me. Really.
David,
I've loved your CERN series! As a diehard science nerd, I have fallen in love with quantum physics and mechanics, and this is an awesome mix of my two passions.
It felt weird reading this as my name is also Andras. It is a common name in Hungary, but not so much in the States, so seeing my name plastered everywhere is odd.
Awesome series man!
Not knocking your drawing abilities -- but this link might make your life a bit easier. As well a make the diagram process more fun
http://www.kevinkertz.com/
Bottom of the page, tiny line of text reads "Download Lighting Diagram." You get a layered PSD to make really sick lighting diagrams. Great tool.
-Justin
Yes, but I respect Kevin's admonition not to use it commercially. Besides, I rather enjoy the "al dente" nature of our diagrams....
:)
It would be great if we started an open-source version of Kevin's lighting diagrams, without any commercial usage restrictions or attribution requirements.
great work as usual... thanks!
I had the chance to tour FNAL (Illinois is so much closer than Switzerland), and the "trigger racks" plus the sheer amount of data they process is what really stuck with me. First, they throw away 99.9% of the data. Now what's left is an amount that can be analyzed a little better, so they do -- and then throw away 99.9% of the data again. Eventually they end up with an amount of data that can be streamed to hard drive and analyzed at leisure to find evidence of one-in-a-trillion events. It's impressive, and it makes a terabyte of photos seem like nothing :)
Did you have to be sensitive to keeping the shutter speed around a multiple of 1/60 (or, maybe 1/50 over there?) to catch full cycles of the fluorescent lights? Or just fugedaboutit and shoot?
The robotic head "swooping" will surely find its way into a Bond film as the means of death for a bad guy.
Nice shots of a fascinating place.
Curious about something, maybe you mentioned this in the previous article, but I don't think so... With all of this electronic equipment in this room, the collider etc, was there any concern of static discharge from the strobes? I mean I imagine the place prob has the best grounding anywhere in the universe to stop that, but still.....
Those Lighting diagrams are golden. And totally. more is explained to a visual person like me than in 1000words. thanks
Simon
Hi David,
What a shame - if I'd known you were in Geneva we could have organised a trip up to Zurich where I'm sure I could have rustled up a group of interested (any paying) folks.
Maybe you could contact me and let me know what it takes and costs to get you interested? I reckon, what with cheap flights at the moment, that it's a possibility still...
Thanks, Jason
Erik, how do you imagine a static discharge from the strobe?
First of all, it does not use static electricity, it does not convert the power into static electricity, it does not run, and would be harmed by static.
Secondly, i don't think you understand how electricity works, ac can jump, because its always looking for ground, as in earth ground, dc (what's used in strobes) does no such thing.
Thirdly, gas, as in air, is a VERY poor conductor, infact in the standard, gas state it's quite an isolator, in order for air to conduct it has to become ionized first (such as what happens just prior to lightning), and without going too far into it and giving you both equations and figures (and i can, if need-be) the strobes can not provide anywhere near enough voltage to do so, even if the racks could act as a ground (and they cant)
Lastly, the racks are grounded, the floors are grounded, the server cases are grounded (and will both act as a Faraday cage). Case being, it's pretty safe to say that nothing David could do with his strobes (electronically) could even potentially cause any harm to any equipment...
-- Alex --
Terrific post. I totally appreciate how you seem to include the basics (gels and wb balance, shutter speeds, ambient balance, etc.) in every one of your post. Not leaving anyone behind has always been one of the most important pieces of your blog post. I continue to be impressed with your ability to speak to the Pros and at the same time stick in the basics.
Thanks,
Jonathan
www.bluephoto.biz
Alex, please do not pretend to know what you're talking about. Your post is utterly insane and contradictory. Any charge seeks to find an equilibrium. Any charge will take a path to ground if possible. A few hundred volts certainly can arc with the right field strength (although it would never happen in this situation). And I'm absolutely in love with "can't act as a ground because they're grounded" :)
I truly appreciate your "how to" instructions in simplifying creative lighting. What gels are your frequent lighters? CTO seems to be the most frequent and now CTB drops in.
Okay, folks -- ease up on the personal attacks, please.
FWIW, I got the chance to visit the Space Shuttle on the launch pad and they made me surrender my flash at the gate. They said it could create static electricity. They also had me tape the on-camera flash down. Apparently they were worried that the flashes could trigger a catastrophic event. Plenty of liquid/gaseous fuel around, no doubt. I was so geeked to be walking next to a spaceship, it never occured to me that I could blow myself up with my flash.
@ anon: let's just say that the security guys are probably repeating a dumbed down explanation that sounds truthy in order to get the great unwashed masses to not use flash. The truth is that it's probably tremendously distracting for the folks working on the launchpad, clearly a place where full and complete attention is desirable.
David, + a bunch on the CERN series, you're a fortunate man to be invited to such cool locations.
This was a really really intersting post. Great write up.. felt like I was there with you guys setting up the shots!
Believe it or not, I actually saw a young lady stick her head inside an earlier generation of this robotic tape handler. One of the access panels was open for maintenance while we were touring the plant; she could hear something moving around inside; so she decided to see exactly what was happening in there. BAM! She survived, but had a helluva headache for a while. Moron.
Anyway, working in the IT industry I have occasional opportunities to shoot technology, this post was eduational and inspirational, thanks so much.
Post a Comment
<< Home