Friday, March 22, 2013

In-Depth: The New Fujifilm X100s

UPDATE: I recorded a ~40-min webcam walk-thru of the cameras best features and how to use them at the bottom of the post.



Short Version: It's a remarkable, sync-at-any-speed camera with a no-apologies 16mp chip. I'll probably make more pictures with this camera over the next year than all of my other cameras combined.

Why, below.

__________


It Sees in the Dark

With great high ISO performance, a lens that is respectable wide open at f/2, and a camera that is sooo hand-holdable at slow shutter speeds, if you can see it you can shoot it. Here's my daughter Em, lit by an iPhone:




At ISO 3200, 1/150th at f/2, this is not anywhere close to pushing the envelope. The camera is useable at ISO 6400, and I can handhold it on a still subject easily at ¼ second. That means I could have shot this same image with six stops less light. The aspheric 35/2 equivalent lens is pretty sharp wide open—see 100% medium size jpeg here.




Remember, there is no mirror flopping around to induce vibration in slow shutter speed shots. This shot of Dubai Knowledge Village was handheld at ¼ sec at f/2.5 at ISO 800. Yeah, there's a tiny bit of movement that you can see at 100%. But holy crap, this camera is hand-holdable.

Both of these are straight out of the camera, too. No post at all.

The Fujifilm X100s is a machine purpose-built for documentary and street shooters. When I shot for papers, many photographers I knew shot with Nikons for daily but kept a Leica M and a 35/2 for their project work that really mattered. This is the first digital camera I have ever used that totally meets that bar.




And it is dead quiet. Not Leica-quiet. Dead quiet. So much so that you might miss the sonic feedback that helps you to handhold better at slow shutter speeds. You can set a variety of artificial sounds at various volumes if you miss the feedback (one sounding almost exactly like an M6) but pretty soon you'll let go of even that. Silent is good.


Sync at Any Speed

This is huge, and of special interest to readers of this site. There are some limitations, namely your flash's t.1 time at a given power setting and the fact that a leaf shutter won't evenly expose wide open at super-high speeds. But that is a physics balancing act that is worth learning.

For that reason, you're always gonna want to use a sync cord of some kind (using a long OCF cord here) or a slave, or a combo of both. That's because every microsecond (1/1000th of a millisecond) counts and all radios have inherent X-microsecond delays.




The sweet spot with the X100s is to shoot on (L)100 ISO, at 1/1000th of a sec at f/2 with the built-in 3-stop ND filter engaged. That will underexpose full daylight. You can then overpower the sun with a small flash and shoot wide open in the process for gorgeous backgrounds at f/2:




(UPDATE: I have since written a full post on this feature, here.)

Because of the ND filter, the equivalent exposure for your flash would be as if it were exposing something fully at f/5.6 at ISO 100. Doable, at modest range with a speedlight in an umbrella. And you can own the sun at any aperture with any monobloc.

The artistic limitation, of course, is the fixed 35mm equivalent lens. Fuji: gimme an aux portrait tele for this camera and I will love you long time.

Sadly, we have had only patches of sun during my X100s play time since returning. So I am saving that for a separate post, and getting the other stuff into this one. Suffice to say, leaf shutter + awesome chip = lighting heaven.


Choose Your Palette



Fuji's film-based knowledge and experience shows in the X100s. I did some all-other-things equal sequences below. But the light was changing enough to where there was different light in different sequences. So basically, judge comparatively inside the separate sequences, but not between them.

A Provia look is their standard-contrast slide film, but you can swap out to Velvia (more punch) Astia (softer) as shown here, in that order:




C-41 shooters will appreciate the nod to color neg, from which you can choose high or low contrast:




Within any preset, you can alter and fine-tweak white balances. But you can also tweak the contrast curve, too, as opposed to just the overall contrast. As with the X100 before it, they do it by giving you separate control of the highlight and shadow contrast (-2 to +2 on each). Here is an Astia frame, spanning -2, 0, and +2 on highlight and shadows together.




Mind you, you can choose to alter highlight and shadow contrast individually, too.

These tonal controls also apply to black and white, as do a series of color filter overlays. For instance, choose BW+red for silvery skin tones. Or choose BW+red and low-contrast highlights for rich dark open skies and clouds with full detail in your landscapes. Is it stuff you could do in Photoshop or Lightroom? Sure. But the point is you can choose to dial in a very personal look right from the camera. If you work in RAW+jpeg, you can have your cake and eat it, too.

And honestly, the jpegs are good enough to where I have not yet been tempted to shoot RAW. But fortunately, their use of the new X-Trans sensor means more RAW support from the big boys in software. But again, you can build a personal style into your jpegs—even if that style is completely neutral—that happens every time you press the button. And they are good jpegs.


Speaking of White Balance

The custom white balance is outstanding. It's better than auto white balance (which it also has) because you grab a custom WB exposure just like with a high-end DSLR. Except it is better than most. Here is a shot into a room lit with a gaggle of mystery fluorescents:




And as with any white balance or color palette you choose, you can quickly move it around via a one-button color shift matrix. You see the effect instantly, too, if you are looking through the electronic viewfinder. (And while on the subject of viewfinders, both the EVF and the optical are excellent. And having the choice is awesome.)


Hip to Be Square

In addition to the 3:2 and 16:9 aspect ratios, you can choose square. It's a mind gimmick of course, but one that helps me see shots differently. Especially when...


Shooting in Toy Camera Mode

Yep, it does built-in "advanced" filters. This is the kind of Instagrammy stuff is something I would normally turn my nose up at. But few of the filters are pretty cool. I like soft focus (think layered gaussian blur, done in-camera) and high key (which shifts the entire tonal scale relatively—this is far more than an exposure shift).

But the one I might find myself using most is the "toy camera" filter. Think Holga, right out of the camera, with weird color shifts and darkened corners, shot on square format:




And while the advanced filters are not themselves stackable, the different settings are. Meaning I can shoot wide-open fuzzy-background flash in full daylight with a square format and a Holga look applied to it, all in-camera.

Somewhere in Brooklyn, a hipster's head just exploded.


Finally, Pitch-Perfect Focusing

The autofocus is light years ahead of its predecessor. Fast and sure, even in near-dark. Which is cool because you will be shooting in the dark with this camera.

And as good as the autofocus is, the manual focus is better. This is especially cool because MF in the old model was all but unusable—bad pitch and no good feedback. Using the electronic viewfinder and one of three chosen "manual assist" modes, you can accurately focus in light that is literally too dark to see in. It's almost creepy.

When manually focusing, you touch the button under your right thumb and a louped center section appears. You can choose straight magnification, a digital version of split image, or something called "focus peaking," in which you can choose two different strengths. They all work surprisingly well. It's just a matter of personal choice. (And the pitch on the focusing ring is perfect.)


Menu Evolution



The menus, a little clunky in the X100, have been intelligently redesigned. The best feature is the Q button, for quick menu, which gives you instant access to most of the commonly used items.

And the other items are arranged in an intelligent menu tree, making many of the things you often need dedicated-button selections. It's quickly intuitive. There is a user-defined function button that sits right near the shutter button. I like it for instant access to ISO. But you can choose to use it for multi-exposure, depth of field preview, self timer, image size, ND filter, etc.

That's the beauty of this camera (or, one of the beauties)—you can dial it into just about any preferred workflow. It fits you like a glove. And if all of this sounds complicated, it's not. It's just that the camera begs to be learned. You adjust it to fit your style and tweak it until it is basically an extension of your mind.

Zack said it very well: the camera totally gets out of the way.


Is it The Perfect Camera?



Nope, nothing is. But it's close. Actually, for what it is, it is damn close. But there are a couple of quibbles.

For one, the shade should come with it. As the X100s ships—with a "slip-off" lens cap and no shade—it is incomplete to me. And while the lens cap is nostalgic (and true to early Leica models) it begs to be lost, leaving you with an unprotected camera.

So you want a hood, but the Fuji model is … shockingly expensive. And there are third-party options available. (I prefer a black hood anyway, so I had little choice but to go third party.) But make sure you get one that bayonets rather than screws. You'll want to quick-swap it out when using built-in flash. (Which I warm-gelled with some Scotch tape.)

So, lose the slip-on lens cap and get a hood and a 49mm skylight filter. And not a crap filter, either, as the aspherical 23mm/2 (35mm/2 equiv.) lens deserves good glass in front. Put the lens cap in a drawer and go filter/hood full-time. That's why we wear cotton shirts. One less thing to lose, and the camera is always ready.

Speaking of the flash, I'd like to see more control. It only goes TTL +- ⅔ stop. I am going to lobby for for a firmware upgrade to -3.0 stops TTL, with full manual control, say 1/1 to 1/32. I think people will want a wink light to set of slaved flashes in manual, and the TTL needs to go well below -⅔ stop to be useful. (Obviously, you can use manual off-camera flash with the hot shoe sync.)

And while the built-in flash is not empirically powerful, remember that you can always jack the sync speed and open the aperture for more reach. God, I love leaf shutters.

Last thing is batteries. The X100s eats them, but not as bad as the X100 did. Still, you'll want a couple extra matchbook-sized batts for all-day shooting. Once again, you can choose OEM or less expensive after-market options. Oh, and it is still possible to easily slip the batteries in the wrong way. Sigh. Just assume you did that when your camera won't power up until you learn to pay attention when installing.

But truly, these are small quibbles compared to the remarkable package offered by the X100s.


Fuji Is the New Leica



Essentially, what you have in the X100s is a tiny, super capable camera with fast, sharp glass that handles like a Leica M. The 16MP X-Trans chip is the best APS-sized chip I have seen—in skin tones, high ISO and sharpness. (They changed the distribution of the RGB pixels and lost the low-pass filter without getting moiré.) It is also insanely customizable. And silent.

Again, echoing Zack Arias here when I agree that Fuji is the new Leica. (UPDATE: Zack's review is now up.) As someone who used many different Leica M film rangefinders, this thing is more Leica M than any digital camera Leica has made yet. By a long shot. And at a small fraction of the cost. If you woulda just used your film M camera with a 35/2 lens permanently on it, as many did, this is your camera.

My prediction: this will be the personal, auxiliary camera of many a working photographer and photojournalist. Heck, it'll be the prime body for many, as this is a camera you could build a career on. David Alan Harvey spent several decades toting around just an M6 and a 35 Summicron. I am enjoying watching him get to know the Fuji X100s. As for myself, I am starting my 2013 round of HCAC assignments and many will be shot with this camera. It's that good.


UPDATE: A Webcam Video Walk-Thru



UPDATE: April 25th -- After passing the 10k frames mark I archived a full, ~40-minute walk-thru of the features on the X100s. Hope it helps anyone new to the camera. Enjoy.


The Dreaded Question

I know every current X100 owner is thinking, "Should I upgrade?"

Agonizing call, as your camera is (a) really decent and (b) not that old. Here's my suggestion, if a bit ironic. If you are totally in love with your X100 and use it a lot, sell it right now and upgrade if you can afford it. The X100s is $1299, so figure prolly $500 difference, depending on how long you wait. But it is $500 better, that's for sure.

FWIW, Fuji sent me an early production model to play with. So I knew what to expect. On the day GPP opened in Dubai, I heard they were flying in a dozen of them to sell along with the launch. I was first in line before the booth opened, to buy the first one.

If you just use your X100 as an occasional, knock-around, travel-light camera, maybe stick with it. But do not handle an X100s because, just don't. You'll be powerless. But the more you use your X100 original, the more you should think about upgrading.

I know. Sorry.

__________

Brand new to Strobist, or lighting? Start here.
Or, jump right into our free Lighting 101 course.
Connect: Discussion Threads | Reader Photos | Twitter

108 Comments:

Blogger tobanphoto said...

Thanks for the great review. What sync speed can you use with radio transmitters without any funny business?

March 22, 2013 10:36 AM  
Blogger M said...

Which brand of bayonet hood do you use?
And where did you buy it from?

March 22, 2013 10:40 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Toban-

Too many variables, IMO. Microseconds matter. Advise a wire as best, slaves as second-best. (Even slaves introduce micro-second delays.)

Remember, you are dealing with shaving microseconds and up-against-the-wall t.1 times. Power levels, and in particular, the strobe itself, matter, too.

Ideal for high power: a wire and an Einstein set to speed mode. I will test that combo on a future post.

March 22, 2013 10:42 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

I got an EzFoto hood/49mm ring and a B+W UV filter, both from Amazon US.

March 22, 2013 10:44 AM  
Blogger Eric Kelly said...

Awesome Review! I'm not in Brooklyn, but my head did explode! Just placed a pre-order with B&H. Can you recommend a decent sync cord? Thanks you-

March 22, 2013 10:45 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

Ideal is a long OCF cord. Nikon works fine with a Nikon flash (i.e., the extra connections are not a hazard/problem). I used a YongNuo 10m OCF cord. Unlike their flashes, I have found the cord to be very reliable.

March 22, 2013 10:50 AM  
Blogger Wonderwall said...

'Somewhere in Brooklyn, a hipster's head just exploded.' muahaha

And I so want this camera.

March 22, 2013 10:57 AM  
Blogger Human Gobo said...

Dammit, Dave!

Anyone wanna buy a used X100? ;)

I'm really curious about the manual focus because the fly-by-wire in the first model was (let's face it) utter crap... is it still fairly slow to register in low-light, or is it actually done right like the Canon 40mm?

March 22, 2013 11:09 AM  
Blogger Bryan Leighty said...

Are you really that worried about someone stealing your camera??

March 22, 2013 11:18 AM  
Blogger Sébastien Barré said...

Thanks. I had the X100 for the longest time, liked it a lot, then switched to the X-Pro1 last year (made considerably faster with the latest firmware). Have you used the X-Pro1, and if that's the case do you feel a vast difference?

March 22, 2013 11:19 AM  
Blogger Mike Padua said...

Fuji's cash registers are on FIRE right now.

March 22, 2013 11:28 AM  
Blogger Michael Sebastian said...

David, great writeup. I have the X-Pro1, and love it except for its autofocus. It's not the horror that some have depicted, but it could be better.

I'd been thinking about the new 23mm lens for the X-Pro1, but since it's not yet available, I'm starting to lean towards the X100S instead. Costs more than the lens alone, but you get a backup body as well.

Are hoods for the X100 and X100s interchangeable? Assume so....

Here's another, but it's more expensive than the EZFoto you mentioned:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005HNNJXA/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A3MIREDL6J0GLS

March 22, 2013 11:29 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Peter - Thanks for the typo. Fixed.

@Michael- Hoods (and most every accessory) are interchangeable.

@Sébastien- The X-Pro-1 is a little too fly-by-wire feeling for me, so sticking with X100s. But Zack loves his.

@Human- Nope. It's fast and super-accurate. Uncanny, almost.

March 22, 2013 11:33 AM  
Blogger Don Boys said...

Are raw converters for this going to be available for either Aperture or Lightroom?

March 22, 2013 12:00 PM  
Blogger tobanphoto said...

Has the buffer on the X100S improved from the X100? I see it has improved almost 3X for jpeg, but can't find any info about RAW performance for the odd sports use..


Also on a side note, I wanted to let you know about a portrait a day project i am working on, that the majority of portraits are shot 'strobist' style with hotshot flashes: www.davidlipnowski.com/365

March 22, 2013 12:25 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

What a great review! Thanks so much. I have a DSLR that I rarely use. Most of my photography is street. I tend to use my Fujifilm X10 95% of the time. After reading this review, I see a 100s in my future.

I do have to say that I really do love the X10. It takes fantastic images, is fast and looks great. The X20 improves on an already great camera. But it appears that the X100s is the sweet spot.

March 22, 2013 12:27 PM  
Blogger Leo Edwards Photo said...

Accurate and to the point - this camera really does deliver - I must of taken delivery of one of the 12 bodies mentioned and have not been able to put it down. Gave the autofocus a good workout at the weekend shooting an olympic kayaking team camped out at Wadi Adventure in Dubai - results here http://leoedwardsphotography.com/fuji-x100s-sublime/

don't hesitate, just pull the trigger and buy one

March 22, 2013 12:30 PM  
Blogger Ahhh... Por que não? said...

Damn...
Should NOT have read this.

Since I´m getting married this year, I´ll probably be looking for an upgrade later than I should :(

Thank´s David for a great review!

March 22, 2013 12:35 PM  
Blogger Reid Bowie said...

Just a tip for those, like me, who are anti-lens shade. On my X100 (no s), I use a B&W Multi UV stacked on top of a cheap best buy UV in which I unscrewed the retaining ring to remove the glass. This allows the lens to rack out without hitting the B&W glass, and there is no 'netting. I'm not going to tell you where I got this from lest I be ridiculed...

March 22, 2013 1:15 PM  
Blogger Brian Kraft Photography said...

Nice write-up, David!

Another little quibble of mine-- no option to toggle the ND filter from the Q button! You have to go diving into the menus to turn it on and off-- a step backwards, really from the X100 (assigning the RAW button).

Anyway, didn't get in the way when I used the X100S to shoot an entire wedding a couple weeks ago. You and/or your readers may enjoy spying that (including my similar comments regarding the use of manual focus in the dark-- amazing!)--

http://www.briankraft.com/Blog/fuji-x100s-wedding-photography-colorado/

Cheers!

March 22, 2013 1:35 PM  
Blogger Alexander said...

David,

I'm a photojournalist with street shooter roots. I love to set my camera a la Bresson for the range of DOF I want to shoot between so I can just frame and shoot without worrying about focusing on each subject. Is that possible with the x100s? I bought an x10 hoping for that feature, but alas, it doesn't work so well.

Alex

March 22, 2013 1:39 PM  
Blogger Alex Marino said...

Does anyone know if the leather case for the X100 works on the X100s?

March 22, 2013 1:44 PM  
Blogger William Ng Photography said...

Newbie q's: Would a Canon OCF cord with a 580ex2 flash work with x100s?

March 22, 2013 1:51 PM  
Blogger TheAlp said...

Can you recommend a brand of filter? so far I have used cheap'ish Hoya UVC filters or nothing.

March 22, 2013 1:55 PM  
Blogger Wake Array said...

How is the macro auto focus on the X100s? It is literally unusable on the x100 and I do so love me some macro... Honestly, focus is my only issue with my x100, I 100% love it otherwise, and will likely be picking this up when I can afford it.

March 22, 2013 2:00 PM  
Blogger ginsbu said...

Thanks for the review. The X100s is sorely tempting me! I do wish Fuji had included face detect AF, having got used to it on my Olympus E-M5. I find it invaluable for the kind of shooting I do a lot of—young, fidgety children indoors at wide apertures—allowing me to shoot with greater fluidity and attending more to composition.

March 22, 2013 2:02 PM  
Blogger Neil van Niekerk said...

Maaaaaan ... I sold my Fuji X100 because the AF was frustrating, even though I thought it was the sexiest camera I had ever owned.

So now I will have to get the X100s.

Great write-up!

March 22, 2013 2:05 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@TheAlp- Yep. B+W. They are awesome, and reasonable at 49mm.

@William- Dunno on the Canon OCF cord.

@Alenxander- Sure, using MF. You can preview the DoF, too. Hyperfocal is great for shooting outdoors in good light.

@Bryan- Some of the places I am headed with it, $1299 USD is a year's salary. So, yeah, I am careful.

@Toban- Reports are the buffer is much improved. But not an issue for me as a jpeg shooter. I seem to remember seeing card speed was limiting factor. Could be wrong, tho.

@Don- Not a RAW shooter, but I think the fact that they ported the X-Trans chip means more love in that dept. Can't speak to specifics.

@Brian- ND is not something I need to toggle fast. But if I did, I'd assign the Fn button to it, (you can) then toggle the ISO (for which I currently use the Fn button) by using the Quick menu.

March 22, 2013 2:07 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

How big is the AF area in AF-S mode with the OVF? This is my biggest irritation with the X100, you just cannot be precise in what you want it to focus on unless you use EVF.

March 22, 2013 2:20 PM  
Blogger Carsten Bockermann said...

I upgraded from the X100 a week ago. AF is in a different league.
Lightroom 4.4 RC1 supports the X100s RAW files.

March 22, 2013 2:40 PM  
Blogger Jac Comfort said...

Wow, I'm impressed!...But, is it a good second camera, backup to major league DSLR (5d markIII) walkaround camera...Just curiuos where it fits in your opinions

March 22, 2013 3:18 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Wake- Macro is much improved, mostly because the crossover point (which was annoyingly far out on the X100) is now much closer. Most shooting will be in normal mode. You'll only switch to macro when you want to get really close.

@Mark- Not sure if I totally understand your Q. But just checked and the AF box is the same size in AF-Single whether you use the OVF or the EVF.

@Carsten- Good to know on RAW file support. Thanks for that.

@Jac- IMO, it is good enough to be a primary body. It is the only body I plan to travel with. If you want the versatility of a 5D-III, lug it around. But I find the "not even on your shoulder" feel of the X100/s makes it my go-to camera. Still have my 35mm FF DSLRs and MF, but this is a constant temptation.

March 22, 2013 3:25 PM  
Blogger Eric Duminil said...

Resistance is futile. :D

How do you focus/compose/expose?
I typically use aperture-priority with AF-S, lock focus with a half-press, recompose and shoot. The problem with the X100 is that the exposure also gets locked with the half-press.
This can lead to completely wrong exposures in contrasty situations.
Did it change with the X100s?

March 22, 2013 3:28 PM  
Blogger Eric Duminil said...

@Wake Array
I don't understand what you mean by "unusable auto focus in macro mode".
At f/4, with EVF, in macro mode and with AF-S, it is totally usable on the X100.
Not so otherwise.
Another possibility is to set manual focus to the minimum distance, and just move the camera closer or further to the subject in order to achieve focus.

March 22, 2013 3:40 PM  
Blogger Ted Zombek said...

So, do you think that a Zeiss or Leica M mount lense will fit?
Ted

March 22, 2013 4:27 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Well, Im not a hipster, but theres now some brains on the wall of my prospect heights apartment.

Truthfully Money's rather tight for me at the moment, im new to the city, freelance work has been very up and down, and finding a survival job in NYC is pretty much impossible, can't even get a job at starbucks lol. But anyway, I can't help but walk around the city and think "Man, I wish I had an X100" there are scenes that im constantly framing in my mind, its an amazing city for street photography..

So anyway David, would the X100 be a mistake to pick up used in your opinion?

March 22, 2013 5:51 PM  
Blogger Human Gobo said...

Awesome, good to hear it's not the same crappy manual focus! I've been such a huge fan of the X100, and it's been my on set/travel camera for work. The AF and the MF of the x100 drove me crazy though... guess I'll be upgrading!

March 22, 2013 7:14 PM  
Blogger ninh fame said...

can you tell us what off camera flash cord and what flash did you use that works with/sync with the new X100S?

thanks,

nick

March 22, 2013 7:18 PM  
Blogger Pat Feltmate said...

Thanks David. Didn't see any comments on viewfinder accuracy above. Can you comment on how accurate the optical viewfinder is for framing?

March 22, 2013 7:48 PM  
Blogger EdG said...

AWWW. I just bought a Nikon 1 system to fill the bill that this cam fills. But this is so much more, and totally destroys the few things I HATE about the Nikon 1. Now I want to peddle my '1 kit and get this. This is sooooo NOT FAIR!

March 23, 2013 11:16 AM  
Blogger achates said...

Thanks for sharing your experience, and let me feel good of keeping my pre-order.
Do you gaffe tape the entire top plate to cover up all silver/chrome, or just the front of the camera? Love to see a picture of your camera from the top. Will replace the gaffe tape from time to time to avoid permanent glue marks?
Thanks!

March 23, 2013 11:31 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Eric-

That's the way I work, too. It's a holdover form my SLR shooting. But I am starting to make use of the much-improved autofocus sensor moving button, which is now a single press with your left thumb at the top of the wheel to engage.

March 23, 2013 1:04 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Ted-

No, but they have an adapter for the X-Pro-1. I have three Leica M lenses, but I still don't see that as being a big draw.

March 23, 2013 1:04 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Unknown-

I actually like the X100 a lot. It was worth learning to work with the autofocus because the ergonomics and flow and quality were really good. If I were in your case, I'd be looking to score an X100 on the very cheap within the next few weeks. If you are lucky, you might grab one for $500.

March 23, 2013 1:06 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Ninh- I used a 10m coiled YongNuo cord, which I bought a few years back. Nikon variant. Works fine.

March 23, 2013 1:07 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Pat- I would say accurate, but a little conservative. Meaning you get a little more than the frame lines show in OVF mode. You can always swap to EVF for 100% accuracy, when the situation warrants. (That's what I do.) And the fact that the camera uses the EVF to replay what you just shot, even in OVF mode, is great feedback.

Oh, and make sure you turn on the parallax compensation for the AF point in OVF mode. Makes a big difference. Dunno why having that "off" is even an option.

March 23, 2013 1:09 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Achates- I gaffed the area up top on the half of the camera over the viewfinder. My main goal was to have it present as matte black (and pretty scruffy) in front. This was both for antitheft and visibility when shooting purposes.

And I sanded/dinged/beat the HELL out of that $8 lens hood. 'Cause I gots that kinda money to BURN.

(It was off of the camera when I did it, natch.)

March 23, 2013 1:11 PM  
Blogger Boomer said...

Why always have the hood on? Seems to add some protection to the lens but, seems like it could add enough bulk to make it less "slip into pocketable"?
Does the lens have issues with flare without it?

March 23, 2013 1:47 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

awesome review!
which camera strap are you using in the x100s' photo ?

March 23, 2013 10:03 PM  
Blogger id said...

Hi guys!

Great review David, it was a pleasure seeing you again at GPP!

@William - I can confirm canon OCF hotshoe sync cable to 580exII works up to 4000th sync...

March 24, 2013 5:17 AM  
Blogger johncarvill said...

Great review. So, re. filters and hoods, do they screw straight on, or do you need an adapter? Can you recommend a 3rd party hood? Thanks.

March 24, 2013 6:07 AM  
Blogger Vladislav B said...

Great review, great camera, BUT: non removable lens = no access to the sensor. Sooner or later (depending on environment) you WILL get some dust inside the camera and on the sensor. I know, there are many good cameras with fixed lenses, but there also is unlimited supply of dust almost everywhere (also in factories assembling cameras).

March 24, 2013 7:59 AM  
Blogger Erik Hill said...

I literally LOL'd at this part..

"Somewhere in Brooklyn, a hipster's head just exploded."

I'll have to admit though, my head almost did explode when I read the preceding info, "Meaning I can shoot wide-open fuzzy-background flash in full daylight with a square format and a Holga look applied to it, all in-camera."

I went from knowing nothing about the Fuji x100 series cameras, to wanting one.. then to needing the x100s by the time I finished reading this post.

Love your posts David, very tecnical and laced with sarcasm and quick witted humor, keep up the great work!

March 24, 2013 10:42 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Vlad- I have used the crap out of my x100 (original) with not a speck of sensor dust. Remember, this lens does not zoom, and thus does not suck in and expel air. I am very happy in that regard. If only I could keep my DSLR sensors this clean.

March 24, 2013 3:38 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@John-

I suggest the EzFoto (black) hood/adapter on Amazon for <$10.

March 24, 2013 3:38 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Unknown- A Domke Gripper, which has hong been my go-to strap for several reasons.

March 24, 2013 3:39 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Boomer- I do not use a pocket, so there is no downside to the hood for me.

Upsides:

• Better flare control.
• Hood/skylight filter offers quicker access (i.e., no lenscap to remove and/or lose)
• WHen in tight quarters, my hand goes right to the hood, as a grip to use my hand to protect the camera knowing into walls, etc.
• It acts as a great brace/notch for the index finger on my left hand. I get *at least* an extra shutter speed out of that for hand holding.

March 24, 2013 3:42 PM  
Blogger Tom Hohl said...

Great... More money flying outta my pocket. As a D3 Shooter, I do tire of lugging it around on family outtings but LOVE the quality I get. Might have to get one of these... Drats!!!!

March 24, 2013 9:56 PM  
Blogger Bob Cooley said...

David, Great review. Man, I JUST got my x100, and am really liking it, but it sounds like I'll love the s, so thanks, (and darn you) :)

oh and "Somewhere in Brooklyn, a hipster's head just exploded..." thanks, now I have to clean my keyboard because I spit coffee onto it laughing...

March 24, 2013 10:37 PM  
Blogger Mathew said...

For flash sync, you could go the exposed-frame-of-film-taped-over-the-built-in-flash route, at least until that firmware upgrade happens

March 25, 2013 6:17 AM  
Blogger J.D. Mulliken said...

I'm hoping Canon's M camera gets this good of a review. My only hesitation to getting this camera would be my heavy investment in Canon EF glass and since they havent really been pushing the envelope since the 7D for a good successor to it (yet) I've really been looking for reasons to jump ship.

March 25, 2013 4:05 PM  
Blogger Eric Duminil said...

The biggest drawback of the hood is IMHO that it shades a whole corner of the viewfinder. At least that's the case with the official Fuji hood. Is it any different with the EZ one?

Also, I'm pretty sure the X100/X100s cannot take picture at 1/4000s f/2.8.
You can set the shutter speed to 1/4000s, the exif says 1/4000s but the leaf shutter probably makes it something between 1/2000s and 1/1000s.

It could be interesting to measure the exact exposure of pictures taken at large apertures and various shutter speeds. f2.0 and 1/1000s does seem to be brighter than f2.0 and 1/2000s with a continuous light source.

@J.D Mulliken:
Buy an X100/X100s, fall in love, notice how much you leave your DSLR at home, sell some glass, take pictures. That seems to be Fuji way.

March 25, 2013 6:17 PM  
Blogger Good old Clive said...

Holy flaming film stock Batman. Kerpow, wham, bang, wallop it's a knockout. Two raving reviews from two respected sources! What's a poor snapper to do?
You and Zack both drooling over next gen of my X100, the next Leica!!!! OK it's a deal, gimme 2, no hang on make it 3, cancel that I'll take a truck full, Fuji will not cope with demand. Mua ha ha ha ha.

March 26, 2013 5:25 AM  
Blogger Vey said...

Hi David,

Big fan of your work. By the way, I was amazed by the cheap camera challenge you did on DigitalRev.

I have a question by way of recommendation. I own an EOS 7D, but my main lens a Sigma 30mm f1.4 I find occasionally limiting so I wanted to sell it and upgrade to something like a Canon 35mm f1.4 L. But now I'm wondering given that I can't always carry an SLR and 3 lenses (others are a Canon 85mm f1.8 and a Tokina 11-16mm f2.8) might it be an idea to go for an X100s?

Cheers,

Vey

March 26, 2013 9:09 AM  
Blogger Gus Samarco said...

"Ideal for high power: a wire and an Einstein set to speed mode. I will test that combo on a future post."

I'll be looking for that one :)

March 26, 2013 12:20 PM  
Blogger Richard Wintle said...

You mention two reasons I used to love my (wife's) Sony DSC-R1 - completely silent shooting (it's an EVF/no mechanical shutter beastie), and sync at any speed (ditto). That said, it crapped out at anything higher than ISO 400 - your test shot of your daughter by iPhone light is incredibly noise-less at ISO 3200. Wow.

March 26, 2013 3:38 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Vey-

Interesting decision. And an EF 35/1.4 is almost exactly the price of the X100s. It sounds like you really like the 35mm focal length, too. I would suggest test driving one somehow (borrow, barter, exchange gear, etc.) to see if the camera fits you. (There is a learning curve.) But it could be a very cool way to augment your system. And yeah, you may find yourself leaving the DSLR at home, as I do. But it's a different animal than your SLR.

FWIW, many photogs I know, for many years, have used an SLR with an aux Leica M in tow (with a 35 on it.) This is absolutely the parallel of that setup for you. It's definitely a good option. Whether it works for you personally, only you can say.

March 27, 2013 12:04 AM  
Blogger wonderlens said...

David, thank you for the great hands-on review, I definitely want to buy this camera! One doubt though: you say you won't be shooting RAW with this camera, does this also go for actual assignments? Is the quality of the JPGs so good that you could think of a general "comeback" of JPG versus raw? (at least given that you "get it right in camera")
I had been planning for ages on getting a 24mm lens for my D300, that plan has just been called off. But funny enough I think the X100S will be replacing for equal parts my SLR and my iPhone. I have been using the phone quite a lot for street photography but was always reluctant about making prints due to quality and resolution. The X100S's lens seems to have the same equivalent focal length as the iPhone4s and the resulting quality is double, not only in resolution.

March 27, 2013 5:00 PM  
Blogger Stefan said...

Hey David,
did you have the chance to compare the x100s with the Olympus OM-D EM5?

I wonder if they are on par or not, the Oly got the ability to adjust the contrast curve and white balance just like the x100s.

March 28, 2013 10:07 AM  
Blogger Bob Cooley said...

Just got mine a couple of days ago and am in love with it!

One question - And apologies for asking here David, but you seem to have great insights into the Fuji product line, and of course more into battery strobes, so you seem the person to ask:

Do you know of any plans for Fuji to sell a hotshoe-based TTL extension cord? It seems like such a logical thing for them to produce, but I've seen no indicators that they are selling one. OR is there a cord on the market already that will allow corded TTL (using Fuji flashes, of course)

Thanks!

March 31, 2013 12:17 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Bob-

That, I do not know. I don't really use TTL flash with Fuji, so is out of my area.

March 31, 2013 1:31 PM  
Blogger Bob Cooley said...

David,

Thanks for the quick reply - as it turns out, I found my answer after a lot of digging - apparently the Canon OC-E3 E-TTL cable has the same pins (with an extra one for Canon strobes)

so it will work as a remote cable for Fuji strobes, and give TTL

it will not, however allow TTL with Canon strobes (it lacks the additional info sent through the extra pin).

Hope that's helpful to some others out there. Cheers!

March 31, 2013 7:52 PM  
Blogger David Williams said...

Hi David, I’ve been trying out the new x100s over the past week and have posted many pictures – http://www.dwwphotography.blogspot.com.au – so you can check them out. I have to agree with you, the upgrades are significant and worthwhile for regular shooters. Your website, composition & blogs are wonderful – thanks, cheers, David

April 01, 2013 4:15 AM  
Blogger Erik Forsberg said...

Great review, many thanks. Have you also got to try the Fujifilm EF-X20? Good for on camera fill perhaps?

April 01, 2013 4:08 PM  
Blogger alexdpx said...

Hi David,

I have finally decided to order one X100s from Gulf Photo Plus and I'm expecting to have it by next week. In the meantime, while waiting for it, I downloaded the Owner's Manual from their site and have started reading. In page 40, Fuji said that 1/4000 is not available at wide apertures from f/2 to f/5.6 because of limitations of the lens-internal shutter.

If you have time to reply, could share how you did this: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8hSLHyCaXpU/UUi14ABfilI/AAAAAAAAH0E/Qr-nGWm144c/s1600/Sync.jpg

Thanks.

Cheers,
Alex

"DO NOT PUBLISH"

April 04, 2013 8:54 AM  
Blogger Randy Gay said...

David, just got my X100s. Thankx for the review. What cable would I need to fire Elinchrom Quadra?

Thanks, Randy
see my work: www.randygay.com

April 06, 2013 9:44 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

Hey Randy-

An X100s syncs via hot shoe, and a Quadra needs a 3.5mm plug. So I'd go for a hot-shoe to 3.5mm nub and a simple audio cord. Or if you had soldering skills, I'd buy an OCF hot shoe-based cord (like a 10m) and convert the flash end to a male 3.5mm plug. Which would be pretty nice, actually.

April 06, 2013 4:34 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

@Vey

I also was looking at the 35mm f/1.4, but on an aps-c sensor like the 7d, the field of view is really 56mm. In your line up of lenses used on a 7d, you are missing a field of view equivalent of 27mm to 48mm.

So, an x100s would get right in the middle of that range you don't have at 35mm.

I'm in the same situation with similar lenses as you, but we'd have to move up to a 5d to take advantage of that true 35mm field of view of that f/1.4 lense.

Hope this helps...

April 06, 2013 6:29 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

@David

Do you know of any electronic air bulb release to do time lapses with the x100s?

Also, just wondering if you could comment on the video quality. I'm looking for a camera with great image quality, but that can take better video than my Android phone. Is the video high quality?

Thanks,
David

April 06, 2013 6:35 PM  
Blogger Bob Biess said...

I rank David's reviews as some of the most credible anywhere, so after reading this one (and many others including dpreview.com) I took the plunge.

If you haven't looked actually finding a X100s to purchase is a bit of a challenge as they're back-ordered everywhere, however, using a tip from a friend I found one at Cameraworld New York for list price and free shipping.

Can't wait to receive it!

p.s. David - Fuji needs to do something nice for you for all the great press you've given this camera! ;)

April 08, 2013 4:38 PM  
Blogger Super Sharp Shooter said...

I hauled my x100 around central america as my only camera for 6 months. 4 months in, the aperture got stuck open at f2 and I lost the ability for it to auto expose, but I still managed to get plenty of great shots out of it shooting in full manual at f2. I've just put it up for sale, and will replace it with the x100s when the time is right. The frustration caused by the slow and flakey autofocus of the original x100, macro mode uselessness, and slight delays in firing will not be missed. I really hope the AF is as fast as is claimed now!

April 10, 2013 5:51 AM  
Blogger Bob Biess said...

'Gaffing' the front of the body is brilliant and as difficult as it will be to do (to a brand-new camera) I'll be giving mine the same treatment. This is a pretty common practice amongst Leica shooters who routinely cover the 'Mx' designation and the Leica logo (red dot) so they draw less attention to the fact that they're pointing a $10K camera at someone. :)

April 10, 2013 4:06 PM  
Blogger Chris R said...

Yeah - they are interchangeable - I purchased a new x100s cover that is labelled X100/X100S - so backwards compatible anyway.

April 10, 2013 9:43 PM  
Blogger Bjarte said...

Awesome review! I have been considering the X20 and X100S but after reading your review I decided on the X100S. And now I've just bought it. It's only 1 day old! :-)
Can you please give me an advice on which memory card to buy?

April 13, 2013 7:18 AM  
Blogger stax eustaquio said...

Hello. Hey, I've seen the x100s review and it was GREAT!!! However, can you do a comparison on which buy...esp now that the xpro1 body is a bit cheaper than the x100s, and the specs for the x100s is a bit more updated or at perhaps at par with the xpro1? thanks. :D

April 13, 2013 8:00 PM  
Blogger stax eustaquio said...

Hello. Hey, I've seen the x100s review and it was GREAT!!! However, can you do a comparison on which to buy...esp now that the xpro1 body is a bit cheaper than the x100s, and the specs for the x100s is a bit more updated or perhaps at par with the xpro1? thanks. :D

April 13, 2013 8:05 PM  
Blogger William Ng Photography said...

I have my x100s for a few days now. I love using it so far. I take it with me everywhere now. It's small and portable. What a welcome break from carrying a DSLR.

I am still adjusting to the smaller size coming from using DSLR. I will definitely need to carry an extra battery if I want the camera to last the full day. But then, it may be due to me keep checking the LCD and playing with the different settings.

The battery definitely goes fast if you use the built-in flash.

April 16, 2013 6:37 PM  
Blogger Andrew said...

FYI - Although Amazon shows 1-3 months for shipping, I ordered mine on Monday and it is scheduled to be delivered today (April 17).

April 17, 2013 2:38 AM  
Blogger Matt Adcock said...

I've been thinking about this one :) Thanks for the thorough post amigo, muy bien!

April 18, 2013 10:00 AM  
Blogger RonnaV said...

Hi David -

Curious whether the EzFoto 49mm Metal Lens Hood blocks the view through the X100S's viewfinders? And too, whether the hood easily releases with a pinch, or whether it must be unscrewed.

Thanks, Ron

April 18, 2013 10:15 AM  
Blogger ThomasT said...

You state that skin tones are great. That was also found on the X100 by a 'color' expert, who noted that nature/landscape etc color on the X100 was NOT great. The Question then must be.. will the S improve on the X100 landscape color. If not, I'll stay with my perfect Fuji FF 175MPP sensor, Velvia 50. I dion't need to change cams' every 6 months!

April 18, 2013 11:06 PM  
Blogger Bryan said...

@Andrew-Did you actually get your camera on 4/17?

April 19, 2013 12:06 AM  
Blogger mizmdjammer said...

Traded in my Canon MDII and the X100 for the X100S. The low-light capability is incredible as you reported. I took shot shots at ISO 3200 in a big top at a traveling circus and couldn't believe how little noise there was at 100%. I will definitely be using it to shoot wedding receptions from now on.

April 20, 2013 1:21 PM  
Blogger Michael said...

Received my x100s this week, the video you added is extremely helpful! Thanks.

April 26, 2013 5:25 PM  
Blogger Michael said...

Thanks for posting the video, very helpful. Got my x100s this week, your guide was the perfect introduction to my new flame.

April 26, 2013 5:30 PM  
Blogger Grisanti said...

Just a quick thanks for posting such an in-depth review. It answers some questions and certainly stirred up more desire for this camera. Does it have a multiple exposure option? Thanks again.

May 01, 2013 6:41 PM  
Blogger Paul Crouse said...

Thanks for posting this excellent video. It is so refreshing to find someone who knows what he is talking about on the Internet.

I just got this camera this week. This is the camera I have wanted ever since I started shooting in the early 1980s.

BTW, the lens hood for a Pentax 40mm 2.8 DA lens works with this (and the adapter ring). It makes for a bit flatter of a profile.

I am glad I have found your website. Keep up the good work!

May 02, 2013 1:38 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hi David, thanks a lot for your awesome review. I was wondering if you could tell us a bit more about the custom presets you use (C1-3)? Can you give us some indication about the different settings you use in order to get 3 different cameras?

Thanks and greetings from Luxembourg,

Yannick

May 02, 2013 6:04 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

So, I thought about a way in which higher dynamic range at higher ISO could make sense for a digital sensor... This is just a hypothesis.

The old way, in the case of film, higher ISO relates to larger grain size. The chance that a large grain catches some light is just higher than with smaller grains, but you intrinsically have less grains per area of film, and every single of these grains only gives you one "data point", so your dynamic range probably stays the same or decreases.

In the case of a digital sensor, there is a clearly defined amount of pixels. At lowest ISO, it should perform as little interpolation between these sensor pixels as possible to create the image pixels. So you only have one sensor point with color information per image-pixel in the extreme case.

If you increase the ISO, the processor probably bundles the information from groups of sensor pixels into one image "superpixel", creating something similar to a large grain, and of course the picture becomes more grainy because the information between these newly calculated image pixels now has to be interpolated. But, where high-iso film only gather one data point for a large grain, on a digital sensor at high iso still the amount of light for each individual pixel in the grouped set pixels is measured. You could create a smart algorithm that combines the scale of light intensity information of each of these grouped pixels into a much finer light intensity scale for the new "superpixel". So even when the group of sensor-pixels will create only a single image-pixel, and then lose some image information due to the interpolation, that single image pixel can still contain a much finer scale of light intensities to work with and thus an increased dynamic range.

I imagine Fuji did something of this kind. With their older cameras they used to just scale down the size of the image for their high dynamic range modes, it seems that now they found an ever smarter way.

May 06, 2013 7:52 PM  
Blogger akis said...

Dear David

At 9-5-2013 i bought one Fujifilm X 100s.
I read many web reviews and i decided to buy this camera and let for a while my DSLR’s. All reviews said its a brilliant camera,some said its the best camera in the world.
Unfortunately the lens of the camera has a flair-ghosting failing.
Semicircular radius are shown when i shot direct or side light sources.
I dont think that with the use of lens hood or uv filter will decrease the fail.
I made some tests.
Here is a link from where you can download 5 photos, where you can see the flair lens failing.The DSCF1423.JPG is without flare because its evening, i just want to show the place i took the photos.

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ehnzfceo7gm0pp1

Could you please tell me if this is a natural failing of the lens?
All the X100s lenses they have the same problem or its only mine with this failing?
It’s unacceptable to pay 1200€ to buy cameras with these kind of problems.
I am so disappointed from Fujifilm.

I made some photos from the same position with my Canon EOS 5 MK II and 24-105/4L is and my Canon EOS 40d with the cheap Canon EF-S lens 18-55/3,5-5,6 and the photos are 100% clear without any flair or ghosting problems.


Thank you
Akis

May 10, 2013 9:06 AM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@akis-

I have not shot in that space in that light, so there is no way I can tell you whether that is normal or an anomaly. All I can tell you is that I have been very happy with the way my x100s handles high contrast situations, and have been posting full-res versions of many photos I have shot with it.

I would suggest you get in touch with Fuji if you have specific technical questions like this.

Best,
DH

May 10, 2013 12:07 PM  
Blogger Olivier Bouton said...

Hi David,
I don't own the X100s. Just a thought:
Regarding the power setting of the X100s' flash, have you thought about taping a piece of -1EV (or more) neutral density gel in front of it, same way you do it with the warmer ? That could bring it down just to what you want. Dunno if that makes sense at all.

May 14, 2013 9:46 AM  
Blogger akis said...

Thanks David

I dont have any technical questions, but i have a lens fail- problem (on a new camera i bought ) when I take photos of light sources.
I was sure that because you have the camera and you did a review maybe you would like to answer to me if is a fail or a natural reaction of the X100s.
I send you a link with photos of this strange rainbow semicircles of the lens of my new Fujifilm X100s.

http://s1333.photobucket.com/user/AVITHOS/library/Fujifilm%20X100s/FUJIFILM%20X100s%20RAINBOW%20SEMICIRCLES%20AT%20NIGHT%20SHOTS

Thank you

Akis

May 14, 2013 3:44 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Olivier-

Alas, it is TTL. It would just put more energy through the flash to compensate for anything in the optical chain.

@Akis-

As I said, I have not had similar issues, but then I have not shot in that environment in those lighting conditions. So there is no way I could tell you if your lens is behaving as it should. Again, I'd suggest you call Fuji...

May 14, 2013 4:35 PM  
Blogger En Cambency said...

You're being dragged into a tar pit, that Akis dude is insufferable and is on some sort of e-crusade because Fuji won't give him a scented-oil rubdown.

May 14, 2013 5:23 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

No tar pit. He just asked the same question twice, so I referred him to the first time I answered his questions. That said, I am willing to bet his question does not pop up in print for a third time here.

;)

May 14, 2013 6:25 PM  
Blogger Foebia said...

Hey David,

So, if I get the hood and UV filter you recommend, do I still need to get the filter adapter from Fuji?

May 15, 2013 1:01 PM  
Blogger David Hobby said...

@Foebia-

No, you do not. The adapter ring comes with the 3rd party shade. #WIN

May 15, 2013 3:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home