Friday, September 07, 2007

Buy One, Get Two Free

Apropos to Tuesday's light balancing discussion is Imationx2006's portrait shot in the water at sunset, which popped up in the Strobist Flickr pool this week. But there's a little more going on here than just light balancing.

On her face it's easy to reverse engineer the light size, and position, thanks to the shadow under the chin. But what's with the fuller, more pearly light on the skin closer to the water? And what of the "white plexiglass" look in the foreground? Spend a moment reverse engineering the light, and then click through to jump to read about all of the variables at play.


One Flash, Three Effects

Alright, let's take a look at everything that is going on here. First, the speedlight (a PW'd Canon 580ex) is firing into a 45" silver umbrella. So you are going to have a nice, soft light source. But this looks a little smoother and fuller than the typical high-umbrella sort of light. That's because there are two reflectors filling the shadows - the water and the sand.

From the model's perspective, the water is throwing back a specular reflection of the umbrella (from the low side.) It's about a stop and a half dimmer from the looks of things. And the sand is throwing back a diffuse reflection, which is larger and softer and dimmer than that of the umbrella's reflection via the water.

Pretty nice set of lights you have there, huh?

Additionally, you have that cool, plexiglass thing happening in the foreground. That's the sand, being lit underwater, and throwing back enough light to be visible even over the water-reflected sunset background. What determines where the through-the-water sand overpowers the sunset, and vice-versa?

Simple. Highest tonal value wins. In case of a tie, you get a namby-pamby mix. Which can be cool, too. And if you spread a piece of black tarp under water for her to sit on, the reflected sunset would own the foreground.

__________

New to Strobist, or lighting? Start here.
Now shipping, in DVD box set or download: Lighting in Layers
Connect: Discussion Threads | Reader Photos | Twitter

11 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where's the -30-?

September 07, 2007 5:00 AM  
Blogger Jordan_McLachlan said...

Really great shot…

And a typically thought-provoking 'expose' David, so thank you.

It's too easy to get caught up in controlling artificial light and only thinking about the effects of 'obvious' ambient light in situations like this.

Paying attention to the more subtle contributions of other reflective surfaces helps increase the Ninja Strobist effect.

Good stuff as ever…

Cheers!

Jordan

September 07, 2007 5:47 AM  
Blogger Thomas Photographers said...

Very interesting observation on the light sources. I would have never thought of the water and sand to be a light source.
I LOVE this site!!!

September 07, 2007 8:51 AM  
Blogger Steven said...

David, thanks for using my image for an article . I was quite surprised when I woke up and checked my favorite site and saw my picture. I reloaded the page a few times to make sure I was really awake :) Image is so great because of what I have learned from this site.

September 07, 2007 9:19 AM  
Blogger Steven said...

David - that is actually a 45 inch Umbrella all along . Little bigger.

September 07, 2007 9:49 AM  
Blogger Ron said...

Love the shot. Beautiful. One little easy-to-fix thing... The area from her knees to chest is slightly too bright, and her face is slightly too dark. Trival to fix in post... tough (for me anyway) to do on location.

I'm guessing that this caused by the light falloff from the distance between the model's face and the umbrella. Would a larger umbrella at a farther distance reduce the falloff effect -- while preserving the apparent size of the light source?? (not that this is a practical solution -- we don't all carry 10 foot umbrellas around in our bags -- its just a theoretical question)

In my view, the successful portrait will generally pull the viewer's eyes to the subject's eyes. And the viewer's eyes will first go to the brightest area.

September 07, 2007 9:52 AM  
Anonymous turbofisk said...

I just came across three great youtube pieces about a photo journalist working in New York... I think you'd really enjoy it and I thought this might be the best way of getting this on your site...

It was originally posted on a Swedish site at this adress: http://foto.feber.se/feber/art/28331/kameran_i_nyllet/

It contains all three pieces...

September 07, 2007 12:03 PM  
Anonymous Julia said...

Ouch. It looks like you pulled the 500x334 image directly from flickr and forced it into 400x267 using the HTML image tag attributes of width="400" and height="267". Instead of nice smooth lines, my browser shows her leg lines to be staircased, and her face looks awful. This is because the browser is trying to resize the image on the fly instead of a nice imaging tool.

I haven't seen you do this to an image before.

September 07, 2007 12:18 PM  
Anonymous pferdefotografie said...

now I would of course like to see it with a black underground added, to see if that makes it still stronger! :-)

September 07, 2007 12:28 PM  
Blogger Joyangel123 said...

Photgography is an amazing technology Yet it didn't do much for her face. Great body with the lighting doing it justice.

from
http://joyangel123.blogspot.com

September 08, 2007 12:51 AM  
Blogger Eric said...

If we add that black tarp, wouldn't we lose the pearly look? The water will become a great mirror of the sunset, but we won't have the diffuse reflection of the sand on the model.

September 08, 2007 11:38 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home